Extended Producer Responsibility

What is EPR?

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) is a regulatory tool that requires product manufacturers, importers and distributors to be significantly responsible for the end-of-life management of their products.

Embedded in these requirements are sustainability-oriented incentives to reduce waste from the product life cycle, promote sustainable material selection, and collect and properly dispose of post-consumer products, batteries, and packaging.

Product sustainability is an increasingly mainstream business requirement. Aside from the legislative and regulatory concerns, ignoring the origin of components and materials, the management of toxic and harmful substances and the sustainability impacts of consumption, disposal and recovery, can lead to significant business risks.

As regulatory requirements vary greatly between jurisdictions and schemes, organisations often require deep subject matter expertise to help deal with the array of requirements and implementing bodies.

Anthesis helps organisations to understand and manage their EPR obligations. With over 15 years of experience delivering compliance services across many different sectors, Anthesis is strategically positioned to meet the specific needs of multiple industries including consumer goods and enterprise electronics, among others.

The EPR Compliance Landscape

The traditional approach of EPR is implemented into national legislation with mandatory requirements affecting organisations, as seen in packaging, products (electronics, WEEE or e-waste) and batteries, being the most common. Since some of these requirements have been around for 20 years, there is a ongoing need for policy reform to reflect the latest product design, types, consumption trends, and resource or waste management.

Current EPR policies and similar, undergoing reform:

• Eco-design – introducing new requirements on product performance and energy labelling, including the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR).
• Chemicals – PFAS updates on restricting manufacture and sale, forcing a move to alternatives.
• Plastic – prohibited use of materials e.g. microplastics and EPS, and taxation models for Single-Use Plastics.
• Packaging – major reform in EPR costs as part of implementing the EU’s Circular Economy Action Plan, including the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR).
• Batteries – EU Regulation impacting material supply product design, recognising batteries role as part of low carbon economy in products and electric vehicles (EV’s).
• Closed-loop recycling – a drive to achieve more of a circular economy, by retaining control of material, limiting international waste shipments and banning export of certain waste materials thereby increasing costs of disposal, and encouraging more investment into recycling e.g, Basel Convention updates.
• Emerging policies – in markets where EPR previously did not exist, governments are rapidly rolling out measures to combat the challenges of product consumption and disposal and appease the NGO, public and industry demands. We’ve recently seen Singapore implement new requirements, and up-and-coming nations in Latin America are next e.g. Chile and Argentina.
• WEEE: Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) regulations are undergoing reform in some countries, such as the UK, with the interplay between future delegated acts for electricals under the EU ESPR also being of consideration to the regulatory landscape for waste electrics and producer responsibility.

 Are you ready for EPR? What businesses should do now

The frameworks of requirements for EPR are quite similar with a declaration of responsibility and financial fulfilment element that is linked to sales volumes. This is how Anthesis can bring the local operations and market intelligence together with a single information and data management solution. The main stages an organisation must follow are:

Qualify: understanding supply chains and routes to market is half the challenge, before looking into the actual legal text of what requirements an organisation needs to meet.

Apply: EPR and similar product stewardship laws, typically holds a registration requirement for obligated businesses to declare they have those responsibilities.

Report: regular reporting is necessary for EPR to quantify requirements. This step is important because it quantifies the costs for an organisation and is made on a declaration basis as an accurate and correct account of volumes by a business leader. In addition to data, information and takeback programs may also be required for the consumer.

Review: not only will policies, targets, and requirements change, so most definitely will the organisation itself. These changes impact the requirements, scope and costs to an organisation, so those responsible for compliance must remain on top of the latest updates.  

Extended Producer Responsibility Services

Anthesis is strategically positioned in key global markets across the value chain to meet the specific needs of multiple industries. Our expertise in extended producer responsibility consulting and product stewardship can be split into three main sections – compliance, implementation and thought leadership.

• Compliance – responsible sourcing, including conflict minerals due diligence requirements, supplier material compliance data management and analysis, and managing product and packaging takeback services from data analysis to report construction and regulatory data submissions.
• Implementation – developing innovative and disruptive business models, managing business process outsourcing and integrating software and systems e.g., EPR compliance management solution.
• Thought leadership – providing analytics and reporting, research and development and strategic communications.

Our product stewardship services ensure products meet global regulations and define clear strategies to achieve set standards. We also offer product sustainability impact assessments as part of our services to help brands create better and sustainable products.